Jesse De Jager vs Mika Lipp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 13 Oct at 10:41 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

J. De Jager vs M. Lipp

Jesse De Jager
Jesse De Jager

Flag NED NED

l
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
Mika Lipp
Mika Lipp

Flag GER GER

w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l

2

Win

2

Played

0

Win

23
Age
22
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Jager 2 - 0 Lipp

They have played 4 sets in total, with Jesse De Jager winning 4 and Mika Lipp winning 0. The last match between Jesse De Jager and Mika Lipp was at the M15 Offenbach, 13-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Jesse De Jager getting the victory 6-3 6-2.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Jager2
Lipp0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1M15 Offenbach(10-13-25)

I.hard
NED Flag
Jesse De Jager
6
6
GER Flag
Mika Lipp
3
2

J. D. Jager vs M. Lipp H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
56.88% (91-69)Career Total W/L52.27% (69-63)
2Indoor0
2Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

J. D. Jager vs M. Lipp Match Preview:

  • Mika Lipp's recent performance on their second serve shows a winning rate of 39.94%, compared to Jesse De Jager’s 45.35%. Could this give Jesse an edge in predictability for match outcomes? It seems likely.
  • In return game performance, Mika impressively wins 50.00% of opponents’ second serve points, slightly edging out Jesse at 49.66%. For first serve returns, Mika leads modestly at 32.39% against Jesse's 30.46%.
  • Under pressure, Mika Lipp excels by saving 50.76% of breakpoints. Jesse, however, has a lower breakpoint save rate of 42.86%. This could hint at Mika performing better in critical moments.
  • Jesse De Jager has a higher win percentage over the past year at 58.82%, whereas Mika Lipp has managed 52.17%. Does this reflect a consistently stronger performance by Jesse? The numbers suggest so.
  • Surface preference shows Mika’s best results on Clay with a 53% win rate, while Jesse favors I.hard, also with a 53% win rate. Their weakest surfaces inversely mirror these stats.
  • The event level and opponent quality indicate that while both players perform at Futures/Satellites $10K events, Mika has faced slightly tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 112.13 compared to Jesse's 148.97.
  • In deciding sets, Jesse has a slight edge with a 50% win rate over the last year, compared to Mika's 46%.

Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing these statistics, Jesse De Jager emerges with a noticeable advantage in second serve performance and overall match win percentage over the last year.

Mika Lipp shows strength in return games and under pressure situations, potentially challenging for key points during the match. However, Jesse's superior breakpoint save performance might limit these opportunities.

Considering recent form and opponent quality, Jesse's ability to win against lower-ranked players consistently could give them the confidence to handle challenging match situations effectively.

Given these factors, Jesse De Jager is predicted to win the upcoming match, assuming form and situational performance trends continue as indicated by the statistics.

Jesse De Jager vs Mika Lipp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. D. Jager vs M. Lipp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
2H2H Matches Won0
4Sets Won0
26Games Won17
9Aces (Total)4
5Total Double Faults7
0:55:33Average Match Time0:55:33
60% (51/85)1st Serve %66% (54/82)
76% (39/51)1st Serve Win %70% (38/54)
50% (17/34)2nd Serve Win %43% (12/28)
50% (3/6)Break Pts Won %43% (3/7)
39% (32/82)Return Points Win %34% (29/85)
100% (2/2)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Jager 51%, Lipp 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jager 51%, Lipp 57%.
Break Points Saved %: Jager 60%, Lipp 52%.

J. D. Jager Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM15 Heraklion - 03-11-2025

Q3

ISRY. Oliel
L
6-3 6-4

Q2

AUTP. Jozwicki
W
6-3 6-1

Q1

SVKS. Stolarik
W
6-3 6-0
CarpetM25 Sarreguemines - 20-10-2025

Q1

GERC. Mueller
L
6-3 7-6(3)
I.hardM15 Offenbach - 13-10-2025

R2

ITAL. Rossi
L
6-7(3) 6-3 6-4

M. Lipp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardM15 Offenbach - 13-10-2025

R1

NEDJ. De
L
6-3 6-2

Q3

NEDJ. De
L
7-6(0) 7-6(5)

Q1

GERK. Mathes
W
3-6 6-4 10-6
ClayM15 Haren - 01-09-2025

R1

BRAJ. Victor
L
7-5 3-6 6-3
ClayM15 Allershausen - 25-08-2025

QF

ESPI. Lopez
L
6-3 6-2
banner

J. D. Jager vs M. Lipp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
56.88% (91/69)YTD Win/Loss52.27% (69/63)
57.18% (203/152)Sets Win/Loss52.86% (157/140)
53.37% (1814/1585)Games Win/Loss51.66% (1449/1356)
58.33% (35/25)Hard Win/Loss53.33% (8/7)
54.12% (46/39)Clay Win/Loss53.10% (60/53)
66.67% (10/5)Indoor Hard W/L25.00% (1/3)
0.1Aces Per Game0.05
165Aces Total72
0.11Double Faults Per Game0.17
185Total Double Faults231
1st MatchAverage Match Time1:1:23
263.21Average Opponent Rank280.18
58% (2646/4590)1st Serve %66% (3438/5219)
63% (1675/2646)1st Serve Win %60% (2053/3438)
50% (975/1944)2nd Serve Win %47% (843/1781)
44% (206/468)Break Points Won % (Total)46% (255/559)
42% (1878/4497)Return Points Win %42% (2183/5153)
0% (0/0)Challenger W/L0.00% (0/1)
56.88% (91/69)Futures W/L52.67% (69/62)
59% (90/152)Best of 3 Sets Win %53% (69/131)
0% (0/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/1)
59% (17/29)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)44% (8/18)
50% (21/42)Deciding Set Win %44% (14/32)
89% (92/82)1st Set Won, Won Match92% (65/60)
11% (92/10)1st Set Won, Lost Match8% (65/5)
13% (67/9)1st Set Lost, Won Match13% (67/9)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

02:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
AUSJ. Duckworth1
AUSM. Bouzige
W1
1.071
W2
6.5
02:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
CANF. Peliwo
AUSM. Dellavedova
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
CZEZ. Kolar7
ESPJ. B. Cosano
W1
1.43
W2
2.58
12:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ITAF. Moroniq
ITAL. Giustino6
W1
2.26
W2
1.55
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
UKRV. Ursu
RUSE. Agafonov
W1
1.69
W2
2.02
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ITAL. SciahbasiWC
NORV. Durasovic
W1
3.2
W2
1.29